🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant forecast – not just the winner citywide, and block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of well-known figure this year for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

It was necessary since they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the system frequently! I was actually a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of ballots added later and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which the opponent would have basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse, young, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump last year went for the progressive this year. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought we might exceed two million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to get over 50%. He has just over 50% but remain around 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he does because then no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo held very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I believe there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for the candidate dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported Cuomo. So there existed a little resistance. But overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. And also, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be more of that – people will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in America – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities exist.