🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the right medical coverage for companies – or for our families – appears to require demands a PhD in healthcare.

The Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Costly

According to a recent study, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $17,000 for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down due to partisan disputes over tax credits which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system doesn't change. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee making average wages pays about five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you contrast that with what the typical American pays. I can name multiple businesses that are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, those payments also cover pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection along with funding medical services. When you add those costs versus our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and company payments. And, like many our government's military, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer have access to workers' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, even with increased taxation required, would remain a better and less expensive approach for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot in this current situation could be that we take serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.